Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7496219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T18:32:07+00:00 2026-05-29T18:32:07+00:00

I read one of Oracles tutorial’s and it mentioned that hashtable is no longer

  • 0

I read one of Oracles tutorial’s and it mentioned that hashtable is no longer synchronised. Since when?
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/collections/implementations/index.html
Third paragraph after the table.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T18:32:09+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 6:32 pm

    No, Hashtable is still sychronized. The paragraph you’re referring to even says so explicitly:

    The legacy collections Vector and Hashtable are synchronized.

    (The preceeding sentence:

    […] The fact that these implementations are unsynchronized […]

    is referring to the collections in the table which do not include HashTable.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I once read that one way to obtain a unique filename in a shell
History: I read from one of Knuth's algorithm book that first computers used the
I am working with WCF .NET 3.5 SP1 and have read that one does
I read somewhere that one should never use error conditions as normal program flow.
I had read somewhere about one specific feature that is present in awk but
i have read in more then one place that using NHibernate's Identifier as Primary
Many people said that one can achieve higher performance by creating read-only and write-only
What are some useful Oracle optimizations one can use for an Application that mostly
I used to think that Oracle does not index a row when one of
I am creating an application in grails that should read from one database and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.