Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4042436
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T13:00:20+00:00 2026-05-20T13:00:20+00:00

I read somewhere (sorry, I can’t find the link) that the For…In loop is

  • 0

I read somewhere (sorry, I can’t find the link) that the For…In loop is not recommended for arrays. It is said here: http://www.openjs.com/articles/for_loop.php that it is meant for associative arrays, and in http://www.w3schools.com/js/js_loop_for_in.asp that is for iterating through all the properties of an object (It does not say that it can be used on arrays). I do not know who to believe. I don’t want this question to become a debate. I just want to know if I could use this in my code without unforeseen side effects. Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T13:00:21+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 1:00 pm

    An array is an object, and array elements are simply properties with the numeric index converted to string. For example, arr[123] refers to a property “123” in the array object arr.

    The for ... in construct works on all objects, not just arrays, and that is cause for confusion.

    When somebody for ... in an array, most often the programmer intends to iterate just all the elements, even most likely in order. For example, if the array holds a bunch of numbers, then the programmer most likely intends to iterate a stream of numbers. The semantics is so similar to array iteration in other programming languages that it is very easy to get confused.

    In JavaScript, this construct does not iterate array elements in order. It iterates all the array’s property names (including the names of inherited prototype functions, any properties added to it, any other non-element properties added to it etc.), and not in order at all. In earlier browsers, it will even find the property length, although in recent browsers these properties are now defined to be hidden for this exact reason — people keep tripping on it!

    With the array of integers above, you get not a stream of numbers, but a stream of text strings. And not the element values, but the names of the properties (which are just the numeric indices not in any order). This is most likely not what the programmer means, if he/she comes from another programming language. If the elements stored in the array happen to be similar numeric values, it confuses the hell out of everybody.

    That’s why you shouldn’t do it. You shouldn’t use a language construct that looks like it does obvious things, but actually does things that are completely different. It creates bugs that are very obscure and very difficult to find.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read somewhere (can't find it now) that large exception hierarchies are a waste
I read somewhere (I can't remember where) that it is possible, in certain circumstances,
I read somewhere that interfaces can have member variables. Static final constants only, can
I've read somewhere (I forget the source, sorry - I think the MS Office
I read somewhere once that the modulus operator is inefficient on small embedded devices
I read somewhere that NTP is based on UDP and there's no security built
I read somewhere in the Microsoft documentation that the content of the ASP.NET's web.config
I read somewhere that one should never use error conditions as normal program flow.
I read somewhere that snprintf is faster than ostringstream. Has anyone has any experiences
I read somewhere that config data is stored under user account->Local Settings->Application data, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.