Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5933191
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T14:56:22+00:00 2026-05-22T14:56:22+00:00

I read that the new process created using vfork() system call executes as a

  • 0

I read that the new process created using vfork() system call executes as a thread in the parent’s address space and until the child thread doesnot calls exit() or exec() system call, the parent is blocked. So I wrote a program using vfork() system call

#include <stdio.h>  
#include <unistd.h>

int main()  
 {  
      pid_t pid;  
      printf("Parent\n");  
      pid = vfork();  
      if(pid==0)  
      {  
          printf("Child\n");  
      }  
      return 0;  
  }

I got the output as follows:

 Parent  
 Child  
 Parent  
 Child  
 Parent  
 Child  
 ....  
 ....  
 ....

I was assuming that the return statement must be calling the exit() system call internally so I was expecting the output as only

Parent  
Child

Can somebody explain me why actually it is not stopping and continuously printing for infinite loop.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T14:56:22+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:56 pm

    You should read the man page for vfork very carefully:

    The vfork() function has the same effect as fork(2), except that the behavior is undefined if the process created by vfork() either modifies any data other than a variable of type pid_t used to store the return value from vfork(), or returns from the function in which vfork() was called, or calls any other function before successfully calling _exit(2) or one of the exec(3) family of functions.

    (above is from the POSIX part of the man page, so applies (potentially) to other environments than Linux).

    You’re calling printf and returning from the child, so the behavior of your program is undefined.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read that the new delegate method can attach more than one event to
I've read that Firefox 3.5 has a new feature in its parser ? Improvements
I like the new Dynamic keyword and read that it can be used as
I've often read that in the Sun JVM short-lived objects (relatively new objects) can
I am really new to Java and I read that synchronized is very expensive
I am new to Java. I just read that class variables in Java have
I've read that the C# version is as follows: Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke( DispatcherPriority.Background, new Action(delegate {
I'm new to Objective-C and Cocoa. I've read that NSInteger and NSNumber are preferred
I've just read an article that supposedly introduced me to a new concept: Up
I've read on articles and books that the use of String s = new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.