Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 249625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:26:35+00:00 2026-05-11T21:26:35+00:00

i read the answer of the question Do event handlers stop garbage collection from

  • 0

i read the answer of the question Do event handlers stop garbage collection from occuring?, but what happens when the publisher is the target ?

To be more specific, i am using MVVM design for a WPF app. Model-View classes raise a NotifyPropertyChanged on every change. In some classes, i need to call a method when something is modified.

I would like to do this:

this.PropertyChanged += this.MyHandler;

Will this instances be destroyed by the GC ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:26:36+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:26 pm

    The GC looks and sees if any references to the object are currently rooted in the application. It is smart enough to handle circular references like the one above.

    In addition, it is smart enough to handle the case where you have two objects, A, and B, and:

    A.Event += B.Handler; 
    B.Event += A.Handler;
    

    If A and B both go out of scope, the GC is smart enough to find and clean both of these objects, even though they subscribe to each other. However, if a separate object (in use) refers to either, it will prevent both from being collected.

    This is one of the main advantages to a true GC solution, when compared to reference counting solutions. Reference counting will fail to collect this, but the .NET gc will handle it perfectly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 124k
  • Answers 124k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you running on OS 3.0? I saw the same… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like you need to register Apache::Session::Memcached with Apache::Session::Wrapper,… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use DATENAME or DATEPART: SELECT DATENAME(dw,GETDATE()) -- Friday SELECT DATEPART(dw,GETDATE())… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am

Related Questions

Sorry, that's the best subject I can come up with, if I understood the
I want do something like this: Button btn1 = new Button(); btn1.Click += new
Let me start with pointing out, this is not an easy question to answer.
I appear to have a memory leak in this piece of code. It is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.