I read the german article about “Make” on Wikipedia and found the following 2 lines:
.c.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
Why is the dependency expression left out and why does the target use a double file extension?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
This is actually defining a suffix rule… it is defining how to build a file ending in “.o” from a corresponding file ending in “.c”, which tells make to infer that “filename.c”, if it exists, is a dependency for “filename.o” for any such filename, and that the “filename.o” file may be built from its *.c dependency with the provided rule.
I should point out, though, that this line is completely unnecessary and is, in fact, not something one should put in a Makefile, since Make is already capable of deducing that type of dependency. You may be interested in my Makefile tutorial as it goes on in quite some detail all the things Make is capable of inferring.