Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6661429
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:16:43+00:00 2026-05-26T02:16:43+00:00

I read through n1429 with the section The algorithms regex_match and regex_search both support

  • 0

I read through n1429 with the section

The algorithms regex_match and regex_search both support a feature not commonly seen in regular expression libraries: a partial match. When the flag std::regex_constants::match_partial is set in the flags passed to the algorithm, then a result of true may be returned if one or more characters were matched, and the state machine then reached the end of the character sequence while there were still states to be matched. […]

But I can not find any trace of that feature in the FCD, nor in the headers of the current gcc-4.7.0. I also looked for a revision of n1429 but again did not find anything. I know that the basis for the proposal had it’s origins in Boost and made it into TR1. But I do not know when match_partial disappeared.

Is the partial match feature still in C++11? Maybe with a different name?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:16:44+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:16 am

    It seems the match_partial flag is removed in N1723 “Proposed Resolutions to Library TR Issues” (2004 Oct) as a resolution to N1507 “Errata to the Regular Expression Proposal”:

    7.34 Meaning of the match_partial flag

    Remove match_partial.

    The rationale according to N1837 “Library Extension Technical Report  Issues List” is that:

    The LWG agrees that this is a useful and implementable feature, but we have repeatedly tried
    and failed to give it an adequate specification. We hope that it will be possible to add this feature
    in a future version.

    I guess there’s no replacement in C++11. You can still use Boost.Regex though (where std::regex comes from), which supports partial match.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read through several questions similar to this one before posting, but did not
I have read through related posts but have not yet found an answer so
I've read through the docs and searched on here, but I'm not quite understanding
Have read through the MSDN naming guidelines and could not find a clear answer,
I read through the techy definition of hidden_fields , but am not sure what
I've read through the custom tags and filters documentation , but I'm not seeing
I have read through some of the suggested questions but I am not sure
I've read through many google plue one button not working questions on here and
I read through quite a few similar questions here on SO but none were
I read through the javadoc and couldn't find anything that resembles it.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.