Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:22:50+00:00 2026-05-11T07:22:50+00:00

I realise that I can’t access Form controls from the DoWork event handler of

  • 0

I realise that I can’t access Form controls from the DoWork event handler of a BackgroundWorker. (And if I try to, I get an Exception, as expected).

However, am I allowed to access other (custom) objects that exist on my Form?

For instance, I’ve created a ‘Settings’ class and instantiated it in my Form and I seem to be able to read and write to its properties.

Is it just luck that this works?

What if I had a static class? Would I be able to access that safely?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:22:50+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:22 am

    @Engram:

    You’ve got the gist of it – CrossThreadCalls are just a nice feature MS put into the .NET Framework to prevent the ‘bonehead’ type of parallel programming mistakes. It can be overridden, as I’m guessing you’ve already found out, by setting the ‘AllowCrossThreadCalls’ property on the class (and not on an instance of the class, e.g. set Label.AllowCrossThreadCalls and not lblMyLabel.AllowCrossThreadCalls).

    But more importantly, you’re right about the need to use some kind of locking mechanism. Whenever you have multiple threads of execution (be it threads, processes or whatever), you need to make sure that when you have one thread reading/writing to a variable, you probably don’t want some other thread barging and changing that value under the feet of the first thread.

    The .NET Framework actually provides several other mechanisms which might be more useful, depending on circumstances, than locking in code. The first is to use a Monitor class, which has the effect of locking a particular object. When you use this, other threads can continue to execute, as long as they don’t try to lock that same object. Another very useful and common parallel-programming idea is the Mutex (or Semaphore). The Mutex is basically like a game of Capture the Flag between your threads. If one thread grabs the flag, no other threads can grab it until the first thread drops it. (A Semaphore is just like a Mutex, except that there can be more than one flag in a game.)

    Obviously, none of these concepts will work in every particular problem – but having a few more tools to help you out might come in handy some day 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I realise that I can prevent unauthenticated users from accessing views at controller level
I realise that you can open the google maps app ready for directions by
I realise that you can't use in app purchases for real things. But does
I realise that you can escape ampersands in batch files using the hat character
I've done numerous searches and I realize that I can just download this file
After reading E-myth Revisited, I realize that I can do a better job at
I just realised that Office 2007 now shows multiple pages per default. I can
I realise that the view/controller stuff will be different between Mac and IPhone apps
I realise that this is a very basic question, but it is one which
I just realise that, for some weird circumstances, I was doing what I believe

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.