Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1100971
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T00:57:56+00:00 2026-05-17T00:57:56+00:00

I realize that each browser would implement it differently, but are there any references

  • 0

I realize that each browser would implement it differently, but are there any references or benchmarks that specify this?

The simplest implementation would seem to be O(n) in the number of children of Node

EDIT: I ran some benchmarks. Here are the results

FireFox 3.6.10 on Linux

inserted 1000 elements into   1000 elements in  131.44 ms (average over 101 trials,  291.31 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: true
inserted 1000 elements into  10000 elements in  235.91 ms (average over  11 trials, 1311.36 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: true
inserted 1000 elements into 100000 elements in 2349.00 ms (average over  2 trials, 14150.50 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: true

inserted 1000 elements into   1000 elements in  13.13 ms (average over 101 trials,   267.00 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: false
inserted 1000 elements into  10000 elements in  67.45 ms (average over  11 trials,  1517.09 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: false
inserted 1000 elements into 100000 elements in 617.00 ms (average over   2 trials, 15214.50 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: false

Chrome 7 on Linux:

inserted  1000 elements into    1000 elements in      0.65 ms (average over   101 trials,     30.34 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: true
inserted  1000 elements into   10000 elements in      1.55 ms (average over    11 trials,    175.09 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: true
inserted  1000 elements into  100000 elements in     12.00 ms (average over     2 trials,   2255.00 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: true
inserted  1000 elements into    1000 elements in      0.49 ms (average over   101 trials,     41.13 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: false
inserted  1000 elements into   10000 elements in      1.36 ms (average over    11 trials,    301.18 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: false
inserted  1000 elements into  100000 elements in     12.00 ms (average over     2 trials,   2565.50 ms inc appendChild) while in dom: false

I created a dom Node, populated it with N elements, and then called insertBefore(newchild, randominitialchild) M times.

in dom: false means that the parent Node was not added to the document tree, so the browser should not be recalculating the layout (I hope?)

The results seem to show that inserting is O(n)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T00:57:56+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 12:57 am
    a.insertBefore(b)
    

    If the nodes are stored in a linked list, then the process is as simple as finding the node before b which takes O(n) time because there are no backwards pointers, only next node pointers. We then change the next pointer of the node before b to a.

    So yes, you are right, the process takes O(n) at best with a linked list, unless the list is doubly-linked.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 542k
  • Answers 542k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use: SELECT p.id as a, p.url as b, t.id as… May 17, 2026 at 3:22 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There are two parts to the problem First Issue You… May 17, 2026 at 3:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I thought I'd show the regex approach, too. It doesn't… May 17, 2026 at 3:18 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I realize that this would be COMPLETELY bad practice in normal situations, but this
I realize that this question is impossible to answer absolutely, but I'm only after
Ok so I realize that this is a pretty vague question, but bear with
I realize that literally it translates to Java Enterprise Edition. But what I'm asking
I realize that since UNIX sockets are platform-specific, there has to be some non-Java
I realize that the query this question is looking for won't be enough to
I realize that far is compiler specific, but my expectation is that the placement
I realize that a whole lot of code cannot fit here, but I am
Are there any algorithms or tools that can increase the resolution of an image
I realize that parameterized SQL queries is the optimal way to sanitize user input

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.