Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I realized that you can add a scope for the whole database or just a number of tables.
The question would be, if you’re going to synchronize a full database, which would be preferrable, one scopename for the whole database, or would it be better to scope and synchronize per schema?
that would depend on some factors: number of tables, frequency of update, sync direction, etc…
have a look at this: SYNC FRAMEWORK SCOPE AND SQL AZURE DATA SYNC DATASET CONSIDERATIONS