Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7749105
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T10:57:26+00:00 2026-06-01T10:57:26+00:00

I really often use: try try with finally so I’m interesting if is possible

  • 0

I really often use:

try
  try
  with
finally

so I’m interesting if is possible to make new syntax operator to not write “try” two times.

let mytry foo bar foobar =
  try 
    try 
      foo
    with 
      | _ -> bar // weird part here, I want to have a match
  finally foobar

mytry 
  <| foo
  <| | :? SocketException -> 
     | _ -> // ok it looks funny but how to realize it?
  <| foobar

the problems I see here are

  • non-common syntax, in mytry there is no try with finally keywords, just <| <| <| for each, but it’s lesser trouble I guess
  • with: I don’t know how can I realize this part. even how it will look if I can realize it…
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T10:57:27+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 10:57 am

    The question is whether you really need try/finally. Most of the time try/finally is used for disposing resources even when exceptions occur. But you can always replace it by the use keyword.

    For example:

    open System.IO
    
    let openFile(url: string) =
        let fileStream = File.OpenText(url)
        try
            try
              let readline = fileStream.ReadLine()
              printfn "Readline: %s" readline
            with
                | :? IOException as ex -> 
                         printfn "IOException: %A" ex
                | ex ->  printfn "Another exception: %A" ex
        finally
            fileStream.Dispose()
    

    can be rewritten as:

    let openFile(url: string) =
        use fileStream = File.OpenText(url)
        try
            let readline = fileStream.ReadLine()
            printfn "Readline: %s" readline
        with
            | :? IOException as ex -> 
                     printfn "IOException: %A" ex
            | ex ->  printfn "Another exception: %A" ex
    

    For the learning purpose, you can define mytry using high-order functions as follows:

    let mytry foo bar foobar =
      try 
        try 
          foo ()
        with 
          | exn -> bar exn
      finally foobar ()
    

    But it doesn’t look really nice on above example:

    let myOpenFile(url: string) =
        let fileStream = File.OpenText(url)
        mytry (fun () -> let readline = fileStream.ReadLine()
                         printfn "Readline: %s" readline)
              (fun ex -> match ex with
                         | :? IOException -> 
                                printfn "IOException: %A" ex
                         | _ -> printfn "Another exception: %A" ex)
              (fun () -> fileStream.Dispose())
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm curious as to how often experienced Haskell programmers really use type inference in
i've often had this issue where i do not really understand how to pass
I'm writing an application in WPF using the MVVM-pattern and will really often use
I don't use excel often, and I haven't really found a good solution to
and sorry for my not really good english. I'll try my best :) I
and sorry for my not really good english. I'll try my best :) I
I often use R to analyze data, and really enjoy Notepad++ along with NppToR.
Often I use Visual studio to edit standalone files (not in a project). So
I caught that I use references not understanding how they really work (that's why
I have often heard this term being used, but I have never really understood

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.