Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 494425
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T05:29:44+00:00 2026-05-13T05:29:44+00:00

I really think the title explains it thoroughly enough. I stumbled upon this oddity

  • 0

I really think the title explains it thoroughly enough. I stumbled upon this oddity when I used an ampersand instead of a plus sign in some string manipulation code. Found it interesting. Could somebody explain this for me?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T05:29:44+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:29 am

    Because all bitwise operators1, including the bitwise and (&), work with 32-bit integers.

    This operator will convert the two operands to signed 32-bit integers using the abstract ToInt32 operation 2, and if the value is not a number, the result of this conversion is 0.

    At the end your expression becomes evaluated as:

    0 & 0; // 0
    

    References:

    1. Binary Bitwise Operators ECMA-262, 3rd. Ed. Section 11.10

    2. ToInt32, ECMA-262, Section 9.5

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

OK, so I couldn't really think of an apropos title that summarizes this. The
I'm used to doing Java programming, where you never really have to think about
The title explains all... I have this snippet of code in my application: String
Ok, the title might sound a bit vague but I really can't think of
I could not think of a better way to title this question. my apologies
Sorry about the title but I can't really think of a quick way of
I'm sorry for the vague title, I think you really have to see the
It's one of those things I see a lot but never really think of.
I just saw a really cool WPF twitter client that I think is developed
It's a really basic question but i can't think at the second. How do

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.