Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3331444
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:35:05+00:00 2026-05-17T23:35:05+00:00

I really want to do something like this: Select * from A join B

  • 0

I really want to do something like this:

Select * 
from A join B on A.key = B.key join C on B.key = C.key -- propagated keys
where exists (select null from B where A.key = B.key and B.Name = "Joe") and
      exists (select null from C where B.key = C.key and C.Name = "Kim")

What would the linq statement look like using Entity Framework 4 and C#?

Update:

Apparently .Contains() will produce “Where Exists” results. So, another attempt
(I don’t know if this will even compile LOL):

var inner1 = from recordB in B
             where recordB.Name = "Joe"
             select recordB.key;

var inner2 = from recordC in C
             where recordC.Name = "Kim"
             select recordC.key;

var result = from recordA in A
             where inner1.Contains( recordA.key) &&
                   inner2.Contains( recordA.key)
             select recordA;

EDIT: WOW this is what actually worked:

var result = from A in Products
             where A.kfield1 == 1 && A.kfield2 == 2 &&
                   ( from B in Btable
                     where B.otherid == "Joe" &&  // field I want to select by
                           B.kfield1 == A.kfield1 &&     
                           B.kfield2 == A.kfield2 // Can keep adding keys here
                     select A.identifier  // unique identity field 
                   ).Contains(A.identifier) &&
                   ( from C in Ctable
                     where C.otherid == "Kim" &&  // field I want to select by
                           C.kfield1 == A.kfield1 &&     
                           C.kfield2 == A.kfield2 // Can keep adding keys here
                     select A.identifier  // unique identity field 
                   ).Contains(A.identifier)
             select A;

This produced this SQL:

SELECT [t0].[identifier], [t0].*
FROM [A] AS [t0]
WHERE ([t0].[kfield1] = @p0) AND ([t0].[kfield2] = @p1) AND (EXISTS(
    SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY]
    FROM [B] AS [t1]
    WHERE ([t0].[identifier] = [t0].[identifier]) AND ([t1].[otherid] = @p2) AND
          ([t1].[kfield1] = [t0].[kfield1]) AND 
          ([t1].[kfield2] = [t0].[kfield2]))) AND (EXISTS(
    SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY]
    FROM [C] AS [t2]
    WHERE ([t0].[identifier] = [t0].[identifier]) AND ([t2].[otherid] = @p3) AND
          ([t2].[kfield1] = [t0].[kfield1]) AND 
          ([t2].[kfiekd2] = [t0].[kfield2]) ))

Which is what I wanted. Notice the [t0].[identifier] = [t0].[identifier], which filters out null values because null doesn’t compare equal to anything including itself (in SQL)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:35:06+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:35 pm

    The .Any() extension method typically maps to exists.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I really just want to do something like x <- as.integer(c(1,2,3)) But because c(1,2,3)
I really want to get this to work, but I feel like I've been
I have a query which is something like this SELECT t.category, tc.product, tc.sub-product, count(*)
I have a query that looks like the following SELECT t1.Name, t2.ID, t2.name FROM
I'm trying to execute a query like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE id
Someone posted something similar but it didn't really solve the problem. I want to
Ok, maybe I'm doing something really stupid. I'm on OSX 10.6.1. I want to
I really want Resharper to format my line-wrapped ternaries in this way return navigator.IsTerminating
What I really want to do is iterate over the keys of a stringmap.
I've my Model something maybe like this : public class Person { public virtual

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.