Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8123453
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T06:11:27+00:00 2026-06-06T06:11:27+00:00

I recently came across the following piece of code. It doesn’t look valid because

  • 0

I recently came across the following piece of code. It doesn’t look valid because of the single instance of triple quotes but seems to work fine. Can anyone explain what’s going on here?

return ("Validation failed(%s): cannot calculate length "
        "of %s.""" % (self.name, value))`
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T06:11:28+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 6:11 am

    All of the strings are concatenated first.

    "" is an empty string.

    The substitutions are then made.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Recently, I came across the following piece of code in perl that returns the
I recently came across the following line of code: var type = (typeof x).toLowerCase();
I came across the following code recently and would like to optimize it: Public
I recently came across the following line of code in a JavaScript book that
I recently had to debug a MachO binary and I came across the following
I recently came across a bit of not-well-tested legacy code for writing data that's
Recently I was reading the following piece of code from oracle collection tutorial when
I was recently studying C# where i came across following for loop // Display
Recently I came across a character range that was the following: [/-+] My very
Recently I came across with the following quiz. Imagine we have this table +--------+

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.