I recently converted a ruby library to a gem, which seemed to break the command line usability
Worked fine as a library
$ ruby -r foobar -e 'p FooBar.question' # => 'answer'
And as a gem, irb knows how to require a gem from command-line switches
$ irb -rubygems -r foobar irb(main):001:0> FooBar.question # => 'answer'
But the same fails for ruby itself:
$ ruby -rubygems -r foobar -e 'p FooBar.question' ruby: no such file to load -- foobar (LoadError)
must I now do this, which seems ugly:
ruby -rubygems -e 'require 'foobar'; p FooBar.question' # => 'answer'
Or is there a way to make the 2 switches work?
Note: I know the gem could add a bin/program for every useful method but I don’t like to pollute the command line namespace unnecessarily
-rubygems is actually the same as -r ubygems.
It doesn’t mess with your search path, as far as I understand, but I think it doesn’t add anything to your -r search path either. I was able to do something like this:
MyHelpfulClass.rb exists in the lib directory specified above.
That kind of sucks, but it at least demonstrates that you can have multiple -r equire directives.
As a slightly less ugly workaround, you can add additional items to the ruby library search path (colon delimited in *nix, semicolon delimited in windows).
If you don’t want to mess with the environment variable, you can add something to the load path yourself: