Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 300837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T06:57:02+00:00 2026-05-12T06:57:02+00:00

I recently converted some Silverlight 3 WCF services to use the new binary http

  • 0

I recently converted some Silverlight 3 WCF services to use the new binary http bindings. Long strings are often sent over to the server for deserialization in these services and I previously used to ensure the data could be read properly. However, with the new binding I can’t find the correct place to add the element:

      <customBinding>
        <binding name="binaryHttpBinding">
          <binaryMessageEncoding maxReadPoolSize="2147483647" maxSessionSize="2147483647" maxWritePoolSize="2147483647"/>
          <httpTransport maxBufferPoolSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647"/>
        </binding>
      </customBinding>

Here’s one attempt:

      <customBinding>
        <binding name="binaryHttpBinding">
          <binaryMessageEncoding maxReadPoolSize="2147483647" maxSessionSize="2147483647" maxWritePoolSize="2147483647"/>
          <httpTransport maxBufferPoolSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647"/>
          <textMessageEncoding>
            <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="5242880"
            maxArrayLength="200000" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384" />
          </textMessageEncoding>
        </binding>
      </customBinding>

That caused other problems – it doesn’t seem like a good idea to have a binary encoding and a textMessageEncoding in the same binding. So using only the binary encoding, how can I increase the reader quotas to allow deserialization of large strings?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T06:57:03+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:57 am

    Here’s the solution I found:

          <customBinding>
            <binding name="binaryHttpBinding">
              <binaryMessageEncoding maxReadPoolSize="2147483647" maxSessionSize="2147483647" maxWritePoolSize="2147483647">
                <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="5242880"
                maxArrayLength="200000" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384" />
              </binaryMessageEncoding>
              <httpTransport maxBufferPoolSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647"/>
            </binding>
          </customBinding>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 211k
  • Answers 211k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The value of :locals is supposed to be a Hash… May 12, 2026 at 10:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The fourth paragraph down in the blog post below indicates… May 12, 2026 at 10:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No - a security restriction of JavaScript is that it… May 12, 2026 at 10:08 pm

Related Questions

I recently was quickly shortening some method names in a JavaScript file and ran
I recently checked out a large C# code base that I will be doing
We have an existing (old) codeline that we have recently converted from VC6 to
I've recently implemented some vectored exception handling to catch errors in our software. This

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.