Question

I recently had my code reviewed by a senior developer in my company. He criticized my design for using too many classes. I am interested to hear your reactions.

I was tasked to create a service which produces an xml file as a result of manipulating 3 other xml files. Let’s name these aaa.xml, bbb.xml and ccc.xml. The service works in two phases. In phase one it scrubs aaa.xml against bbb.xml. In the second phase, it merges the product of phase one with ccc.xml to produce a final result.

I chose a design with three classes: an XmlService class which used two other classes, a scrubber class and a merger class. I kept the scrubbing and merging classes separate because the both classes were large and featured distinct logic.

I thought my approach was good because it kept my classes small and cohesive. My approach also helped to control the size of my test class.

The senior developer asserted that the scrubbing and merging classes would only be used by the XmlService class, and should therefore be part of it. He felt this would make the XMLService cohesive and this is what being cohesive means according to him. He also feels that breaking up classes this way makes them loose cohesiveness.

The irony is I tried to break these classes to achieve cohesiveness. What do you think? Who is right or wrong? Are we both right? Thank you for your suggestions.

Answer 1

If you follow the single responsibility principle (and based on the tone of your question, I think you do follow it), then the answer is clear:

1. A class is too big when it does more than one thing; and
2. A class is too small when it fails to fulfill its purpose.

That’s very broad and indeed subjective — hence the struggle with your colleague. On your side, you can argue:

• There’s absolutely no problem in creating additional classes — It’s a non-issue, compile-wise and runtime-wise.
• The current implementation of the service may suggest that these classes “belong” to it, but that may change.
• You can test each functionality separately.
• You can apply dependency injection.
• You ease the cognitive load of understanding the inner working of the service, because its code is smaller and better organized.

Furthermore, I think your boss has a misguided understanding of cohesion. Think of it as focus: the narrower the focus of your program, the higher the cohesion. If the code on your satellite classes is merged within the service class, the latter becomes less focused (less cohesive). It’s generally accepted that higher cohesion is preferred over lower cohesion. Try to enlighten his/her view about it.