Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 620325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:45:05+00:00 2026-05-13T18:45:05+00:00

I recently read that making a class singleton makes it impossible to mock the

  • 0

I recently read that making a class singleton makes it impossible to mock the objects of the class, which makes it difficult to test its clients. I could not immediately understand the underlying reason. Can someone please explain what makes it impossible to mock a singleton class? Also, are there any more problems associated with making a class singleton?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:45:05+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:45 pm

    Of course, I could write something like don’t use singleton, they are evil, use Guice/Spring/whatever but first, this wouldn’t answer your question and second, you sometimes have to deal with singleton, when using legacy code for example.

    So, let’s not discuss the good or bad about singleton (there is another question for this) but let’s see how to handle them during testing. First, let’s look at a common implementation of the singleton:

    public class Singleton {
        private Singleton() { }
    
        private static class SingletonHolder {
            private static final Singleton INSTANCE = new Singleton();
        }
    
        public static Singleton getInstance() {
            return SingletonHolder.INSTANCE;
        }
    
        public String getFoo() {
            return "bar";
        }
    }
    

    There are two testing problems here:

    1. The constructor is private so we can’t extend it (and we can’t control the creation of instances in tests but, well, that’s the point of singletons).

    2. The getInstance is static so it’s hard to inject a fake instead of the singleton object in the code using the singleton.

    For mocking frameworks based on inheritance and polymorphism, both points are obviously big issues. If you have the control of the code, one option is to make your singleton "more testable" by adding a setter allowing to tweak the internal field as described in Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Singleton (you don’t even need a mocking framework in that case). If you don’t, modern mocking frameworks based on interception and AOP concepts allow to overcome the previously mentioned problems.

    For example, Mocking Static Method Calls shows how to mock a Singleton using JMockit Expectations.

    Another option would be to use PowerMock, an extension to Mockito or JMock which allows to mock stuff normally not mock-able like static, final, private or constructor methods. Also you can access the internals of a class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 384k
  • Answers 384k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would prefer to get rid of the semantic variation… May 14, 2026 at 11:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Dunno if I'm missing something, but: <?php function concatinateStrigs($a, $b){… May 14, 2026 at 11:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This would work: StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(bcdDigits.length * 2);… May 14, 2026 at 11:08 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.