Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 839107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T05:24:50+00:00 2026-05-15T05:24:50+00:00

I recently saw some code that reminded me to ask this question. Lately, I’ve

  • 0

I recently saw some code that reminded me to ask this question. Lately, I’ve been seeing a lot of this:

use Scalar::Util 'reftype';

if ( reftype $some_ref eq reftype { } ) { ... }

What is the purpose of calling reftype on an anonymous hashref? Why not just say eq 'HASH' ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T05:24:50+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:24 am

    You could compare it to ‘HASH’ now, because that’s what comes back now.

    But it might not always.

    A good example is the change they did to a compiled regex. In older Perls reftype was a SCALAR. However, as of 5.12 (I believe) it is now its own type, REGEXP. Example:

    perl -MScalar::Util=reftype -e "print reftype qr//" on 5.8 gives SCALAR, but the same on 5.12 gives REGEXP.

    You can see another application of this from this question I asked a while back, except there it used ref instead of reftype. Principle is the same though.

    Simply, by comparing it to reftype {}, they’re guarenteeing that it’s exactly right now and in the future without (and I think this is the killer feature) hardcoding yet another string into your program.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.