Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 112987
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:37:53+00:00 2026-05-11T02:37:53+00:00

I recently started working in Java and was introduced to the wild and crazy

  • 0

I recently started working in Java and was introduced to the wild and crazy world of getters and setters for everything. I hated it at first, but quickly got used to it. Too used to it.

I have been spending a lot of time lately thinking more about class design. One of the things I am trying to do is avoid the trap of doing getters and setters for everything. However, much of the work I do is with entities that are mainly data containers and I am not certain that getters and setters are actually inappropriate in these cases.

Here is a simple example using public properties.

class Space {     public String name;     public String description;     Space(final String name, final String description) {         this.name = name;         this.description = description;     } } 

Here is a simple example using private properties and using getters and setters.

class Space {     private String name;     private String description;     Space(final String name, final String description) {         this.name = name;         this.description = description;     }     public String getName() {         return this.name;     }     public void setName(final String name) {         this.name = name;     }     public String getDescription() {         return this.description;     }     public void setDescription(final String description) {         this.description = description;     } } 

In these examples, both the name and the description fields should be able to be changed.

I feel like the getter/setter example is more clear and hides the implementation details of what name and description are. It would also allow for validation on set later if needed.

I have read several discussions about getters and setters being evil and/or an anti-pattern, but it really feels like those might not apply to this situation.

Maybe there are some options I have not yet considered. I’m open for suggestions!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:37:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:37 am

    To put it simple:

    • You need getters for all fields that must be read from the outside.
    • You need setters for all fields that must be written from the outside.

    This can be 100%, but most of the time it is less.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have recently started working on an app which has both Java and native
I recently started working on a large complex application, and I've just been assigned
I recently started working at a company with an enormous enterprisey application. At my
I've only recently started working with asp.net and c#. Is there a standard practice
I have recently started working on a very large C++ project that, after completing
I've recently started working with Aptana and Eclipse Monkey. What I want to do
I have only recently started working with the MVC approach, so I suppose this
I have recently started working with Unified Communication Managed API 2.0 (UCMA) and Office
I have recently started using Vim as my text editor and am currently working
Recently an application I wrote started not working on Internet Explorer. There has been

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.