Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7536277
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T06:31:48+00:00 2026-05-30T06:31:48+00:00

I recently stumbled over something. I wanted to add the ability to remove an

  • 0

I recently stumbled over something. I wanted to add the ability to remove an object from an array like this:

someArray.remove(element)

I wanted to use the extend operator of CoffeeScript and do it the following:

Array::remove = (element) ->
  return false unless _.include(this, element)
  this = this.splice(_.indexOf(this, element), 1)
  true

But the prototype function, that is created points this to the Array object itself, so the only way is to return something, which would look like this:

someArray = someArray.remove(element)

and the implementation for that like this:

Array::remove = (element) ->
  return this unless _.include(this, element)
  this.splice(_.indexOf(this, element), 1)

In ruby this is the exact difference between join and join!.

Is there any way to achieve this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T06:31:50+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 6:31 am

    I think you are mistaken about splice. It operates on the array itself. This seems to do the trick, unless I completely misunderstood your question:

    _ = require "underscore"
    
    Array::remove = (element) ->
      index = _.indexOf @, element
      return false if index is -1
      @splice index, 1
      true
    
    foo = ["a", "b", "c"]
    console.log foo            # => ['a', 'b', 'c']
    console.log foo.remove "b" # => true
    console.log foo            # => ['a', 'c']
    console.log foo.remove "d" # => false
    console.log foo            # => ['a', 'c']
    

    Note that coffeescript includes a shim for indexOf, so underscore is not strictly needed, so you could do:

    Array::remove = (element) ->
      index = @indexOf element
      return false if index is -1
      @splice index, 1
      true
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've recently stumbled over this expression: True == False in (False,) It evaluates to
I recently stumbled over this post , which introduces the collect method for Scala
I recently stumbled over the D programming Language and i really like it. You
Recently I stumbled over this code snippet in Ruby: @data = 3.chr * 5
Recently I stumbled over code such as this: void foo(const Bar* b) { ...
I recently stumbled upon this Wikipedia article . From my experience with multi-threading I
we recently stumbled over a behaviour of NHibernate that gave us a real headache
I have recently stumbled upon a problem with selecting relationship details from a 1
I recently stumbled upon a global hotkey class ( This one ), it works
I've recently stumbled across the ability to use boomarks in Visual Studio. ( http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/42973/Using-Bookmark-in-Visual-Studio.aspx

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.