Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 729337
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:47:08+00:00 2026-05-14T06:47:08+00:00

I recognized that calling a method on an Oracle Object Type takes longer when

  • 0

I recognized that calling a method on an Oracle Object Type takes longer when the instance gets bigger.

The code below just adds rows to a collection stored in the Object Type and calls the empty dummy-procedure in the loop.

Calls are taking longer when more rows are in the collection. When I just remove the call to dummy, performance is much better (the collection still contains the same number of records):

Calling dummy:               Not calling dummy:
11                           0
81                           0
158                          0

Code to reproduce:

Create Type t_tab Is Table Of VARCHAR2(10000);

Create Type test_type As Object(
  tab t_tab,
  Member Procedure dummy
);

Create Type Body test_type As
  Member Procedure dummy As Begin
    Null;  --# Do nothing
  End dummy;
End;


Declare
  v_test_type  test_type := New test_type( New t_tab() );

  Procedure run_test As
    start_time  NUMBER := dbms_utility.get_time;
  Begin
    For i In 1 .. 200 Loop
      v_test_Type.tab.Extend;
      v_test_Type.tab(v_test_Type.tab.Last) := Lpad(' ', 10000);
      v_test_Type.dummy();  --# Removed this line in second test
    End Loop;
    dbms_output.put_line( dbms_utility.get_time - start_time );
  End run_test;

Begin
  run_test;
  run_test;
  run_test;
End;

I tried with both 10g and 11g.
Can anyone explain/reproduce this behavior?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:47:09+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:47 am

    Found out myself, the problem is described in Using SELF IN OUT NOCOPY with Member Procedures:

    In member procedures, if SELF is not declared, its parameter mode defaults to IN OUT.

    So with every procedure call my whole object was copied twice, and as size was increasing this took longer and longer.


    The solution is to use SELF IN OUT NOCOPY test_type as first parameter of my procedure declaration:

    Create Type test_type As Object(
      tab t_tab,
      Member Procedure dummy(SELF IN OUT NOCOPY test_type)
    );
    

    and is still called without parameter

    v_test_type.dummy();
    

    Performance is back to normal:

    0
    0
    0
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 461k
  • Answers 461k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm quite positive that this article can help a lot.… May 16, 2026 at 12:01 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First of all I think a better pattern to match… May 16, 2026 at 12:01 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer to answer your question: if(strpos($path,'../') !== false){ // looks like… May 16, 2026 at 12:01 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.