Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3277362
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:21:36+00:00 2026-05-17T19:21:36+00:00

I remember a while ago reading about an alternative (aka faster) way to perform

  • 0

I remember a while ago reading about an alternative (aka faster) way to perform a getPixel()-ish method.

Problem is, I don’t remember where I read that, and I’ve searched thoroughly.. I think.

The answer had something to do with locking the Bitmap in memory, or something like that.

I need to run getPixel() multiple times “per-tick,” which is very costly it seems.

Does anyone know what I’m talking about?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:21:36+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:21 pm

    You’re probably thinking about Bitmap.getPixels(), which will copy any part of the Bitmap into an array. From that point on, you can directly access any pixel using a simple array access, which is a lot faster than calling Bitmap.getPixel() multiple times.

    You’ll be facing a performance vs. memory decision here: If you need to query pixels a lot and if your bitmap rarely changes, keep the array around (at the expense of having that array in memory). If not, release interest in the array as soon as possible to ensure that it can be collected when necessary. Obviously, avoid calling getPixels() a lot – the idea is to call it once and then query the array many times.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.