Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4615760
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T01:53:09+00:00 2026-05-22T01:53:09+00:00

I saw this pattern: Money = (function() { function Money(rawString) { this.cents = this.parseCents(rawString);

  • 0

I saw this pattern:

Money = (function() {
    function Money(rawString) {
        this.cents = this.parseCents(rawString);
    }
});

in this CoffeeScript screencast preview. (The homepage for the screencast is here.)

Now, I don’t understand this pattern. There is a Money function that contains a Money function. What’s that about?

Could someone explain?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T01:53:10+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 1:53 am

    As quoted, there’s no point to that pattern other than that the outer Money symbol can be deleted from the window object (except on IE7 and below, but that’s another story) because it’s a normal (implicit) property of window (as opposed to a var or a symbol deriving from a function declaration). But even then, the outer Money symbol receives a function that does absolutely nothing. Could it be misquoted?

    For instance, here’s a fairly standard patttern:

    Money = (function() {
        var someCompletelyPrivateVariable;
    
        function doSomethingCompletelyPrivate() {
        }
    
        function Money(rawString) {
            this.cents = this.parseCents(rawString);
        }
    
        return Money;
    })();
    

    That’s the module pattern, and it lets you have completely private variables and functions (both illustrated) whilst only having one public symbol. But I’ve had to edit a fair bit to create that (the most significant edits being the return Money; at the end and the addition of () after the anonymous function so we’re calling it rather than just defining it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I saw a lot of posts about this pattern, but still don't understand why
I saw this on a screencast and couldn't figure out what it was. Reference
I like the pattern I saw in this blog post ( http://marekblotny.blogspot.com/2009/04/conventions-after-rewrite.html ), where
I saw use of this pattern to concatenate onto a string in some code
I'm making a javascript/canvas game and I saw this example on CSS Tricks. Here's
[^\x20-\x7E] I saw this pattern used for a regular expression in which the goal
This is about the Factory Pattern. I am a little confused. I saw implementations
Saw this piece of code in a Ruby on Rails book. This first one
I saw this in an answer to another question , in reference to shortcomings
I saw this same question for VIM and it has been something that I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.