Question

I see big player (i.e. akamai) started to drop the Expires header all together and only use Cache-Control, e.g.

curl -I https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/395029_379645875452936_1719075242_n.jpg

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Last-Modified: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:46:43 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Cache-Control: max-age=1209600

So still any reason to keep using Expires?

Answer 1

Cache-Control was introduced in HTTP 1.1 to replace Expires. If both headers are present, Cache-Control is preferred over Expires:

If a response includes both an Expires header and a max-age
directive, the max-age directive overrides the Expires header, even
if the Expires header is more restrictive. This rule allows an origin
server to provide, for a given response, a longer expiration time to
an HTTP/1.1 (or later) cache than to an HTTP/1.0 cache. This might be
useful if certain HTTP/1.0 caches improperly calculate ages or
expiration times, perhaps due to desynchronized clocks.

But there are still clients out there that can only HTTP 1.0. So for HTTP 1.0 requests/responses, you should still use Expires.