Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5987783
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:51:53+00:00 2026-05-22T22:51:53+00:00

I see it is a lot faster developing a WS in TIBCO compared to

  • 0

I see it is a lot faster developing a WS in TIBCO compared to coding in Java.

Is it wise investment to use TIBCO as your WS Service Provider & Service Requester?

Also both previous question for developing a JMS consumer & publisher.

How would my Server-side Java code use/listen to the BW Process? So far I read about TIBCO Adapters to do that with a lot of features like monitoring, but would this be just an overhead? Is it better to just code your WS & JMS codes in your Java app?

How do you decide if you would implement a functionality in Java or in TIBCO (e.g. send a Mail, Logging, etc.)?

Thanks a lot!
Thirdy

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:51:54+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:51 pm

    Using TIBCO Business Works to implement your SOAP Web Services and to invoke SOAP Web Services will certainly save you a lot of time compared to creating them in Java.

    Whether it’s a “wise investment” really depends on the amount of development your doing. The TIBCO BW licenses are not cheap, but with a large development team and a large body of development work, you can get a return on investment very quickly. If you’ve got just one project and only a couple of developers, you might not see a return on investment (i.e., the license cost could be more than the cost of developing the project in Java).

    Your Server-side Java code would use/listen to BW by simply invoking the web services. Axis 2 will make your life easier in this regard.

    In terms of deciding what you would develop in Java and what you would develop in TIBCO BW, I would answer everything you can in TIBCO BW, with some custom java where you need it. BW is Java based, so it’s trivially easy to add Java code to any project.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I see a lot of IoC frameworks for .Net and Java. Does anyone know
I see lot of example opening popup with jquery but don't see anything that
I see lot of new machines and laptops now having 64 bit hardware and
I see a lot of talk on here about functional languages and stuff. Why
I see a lot of example code for C# classes that does this: public
I see a lot of code like this: function Base() {} function Sub() {}
I see a lot of c++ code that looks like this: for( const_iterator it
I see a lot of different point of views on internet concerning meta tags
I see a lot of debate going back and forth on which language to
I see a lot of questions, both here on SO and elsewhere, about maintaining

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.