Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8466065
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T15:13:58+00:00 2026-06-10T15:13:58+00:00

I see literal notation like %w[foo bar] being used all the time, but I

  • 0

I see literal notation like %w[foo bar] being used all the time, but I dont see the benefit in using that over ["foo", "bar"]. Is it used as convention, or is this some performance/time benefit?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T15:13:59+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 3:13 pm

    In some cases it’s more readable. Compare these made-up examples:

    %w(the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog)
    ["the", "quick", "brown", "fox", "jumped", "over", "the", "lazy", "dog"]
    "the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog".split(' ')
    

    While the third one is almost as readable as the first one, it performs worse (needs to allocate and populate array). The first two, on the other hand, are processed at parse time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I see this all the time: object literals declared such that some keys are
see fiddle if patient has time slot alloted already then make color yellow using
I am using MVC3 and that i know MVC3 support binding JSON literal to
I have a literal array that is loaded when the page loads... See below:
When we check the register usage by using xptxas we see something like this:
I am trying to do, something like this You can see that collapsible DIV
See Deepa answer for the solution :) I read all of the solution given
See this question. How to show popup message like in stackoverflow I am trying
I see a lot of legacy code like this: class A { public static
As you can see below, objects in Objective-C all have an isa field which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.