Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6943737
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T13:11:44+00:00 2026-05-27T13:11:44+00:00

I see quite a few good old useful methods or even entire classes being

  • 0

I see quite a few good old useful methods or even entire classes being “deprecated and obsolete”.

But code that used to call those methods continues to work. So, what does this mean to me, as an Android applications developer?

  1. Continue using this method as long as I want, because newer SDKs
    will always remain backward compatible.
  2. It will work as long as I build for older targets (e.g. API 8), but
    if I build from API 14 up, the compiler will refuse to complete
    the build.
  3. Both (1) and (2)
  4. Other?

This is especially confusing when no alternatives are provided, as in the case of WebView.PictureListener.html#onNewPicture.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T13:11:44+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 1:11 pm

    It usually means that there’s either a better way of doing things or that the deprecated functionality had some irreparable flaw and should be avoided. You can usually keep using deprecated methods, but you are advised to either switch to some new API (in the first case) or find some other way of doing what you want (in the second).

    Regarding onNewPicture in particular, the entire PictureListener interface is deprecated. There’s no sign of what, if anything, is supposed to replace it. A comment by @CommonsWare in this thread is food for thought:

    It is conceivable that upstream changes in WebKit are driving the deprecation and that support for PictureListener might be totally lost in some future release.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Quite often in ANSI C code I can see parenthesis sorrounding a single return
I've see this sort of thing in Java code quite often... try { fileStream.close();
I have seen quite a few code samples/plugins that promote uploading assets directly to
I see quite a few different issues with the alert window and new lines.
I've seen quite a few books about Scala, but those are so similar to
I see quite a few changed interfaces in JDK7, e.g., the addition of ResultSet.getObject(String,
I have quite a few lines of code that create objects and using various
I quite often see on the Internet various complaints that other peoples examples of
I didn't quite get / see what I was hoping for and maybe missed,
It's quite often to see com.* package namespace. What does 'com' mean? Thanks.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.