Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7686871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T19:34:40+00:00 2026-05-31T19:34:40+00:00

I see several programmers, including Apple, creating codes where they declare stuff like this:

  • 0

I see several programmers, including Apple, creating codes where they declare stuff like this:

CGRect myRect = CGRectMake (0.f, 0.f, 20.f, 10.f);

or

[myView setAlpha:.7f];

instead of

CGRect myRect = CGRectMake (0.0f, 0.0f, 20.0f, 10.0f);
// and
[myView setAlpha:0.7f];

what the advantage of doing that? Smaller final binary? Faster code?

thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T19:34:40+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:34 pm

    This is just laziness/taste: both 0.f and 0.0f as well as .7f and 0.7f produce exactly the same floating point numbers. There is no difference whatsoever, it’s only that the C syntax allows to omit the zero before or after that dot.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

guys. I see several cases like: class Derived:public Base{ public: Derived(...):Base(...){} } Is what
Say a table has several subclass types. How can I see all columns from
I am just starting to learn F#. In several F# coding examples I see
See title. By lightweight markup I mean something like markdown or wikitext.
See: Understanding Pointers In many C flavoured languages, and some older languages like Fortran,
So, I've been beating my head against the wall of this issue for several
I see several articles on the interwebs about MVCContrib's subcontroller feature, but I don't
I see several people saying that WPF can use Custom Type Descriptors for Change
First, the problem: I have several free projects, and as any software they contains
I posted this on programmers first , but was told it belongs here. Funny,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.