Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8760173
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T14:58:45+00:00 2026-06-13T14:58:45+00:00

I see that Scala standard library misses the method to get ranges of objects

  • 0

I see that Scala standard library misses the method to get ranges of objects in the collection, that satisfy the predicate:

def <???>(p: A => Boolean): List[List[A]] = {
  val buf = collection.mutable.ListBuffer[List[A]]()
  var elems = this.dropWhile(e => !p(e))
  while (elems.nonEmpty) {
    buf += elems.takeWhile(p)
    elems = elems.dropWhile(e => !p(e))
  }
  buf.toList
}

What would be the good name for such method? And is my implementation good enough?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T14:58:47+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:58 pm

    I’d go for chunkWith or chunkBy

    As for your implementation, I think this cries out for recursion! See if you can fill out this

    @tailrec def chunkBy[A](l: List[A], acc: List[List[A]] = Nil)(p: A => Boolean): List[List[A]] = l match {
      case Nil => acc
      case l    =>
        val next = l dropWhile !p
        val (chunk, rest) = next span p
        chunkBy(rest, chunk :: acc)(p)
    }
    

    Why recursion? It’s much easier to understand the algorithm and more likely to be bug-free (given the absence of vars).

    The syntax !p for the negation of a predicate is achieved via an implicit conversion

    implicit def PredicateW[A](p: A => Boolean) = new {
      def unary_! : A => Boolean = a => !p(a)
    }
    

    I generally keep this around as it’s astoundingly useful

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I see that most of big websites are returning javascript objects instead of pure
I see that many people get this error, but their situations all appear a
I see that you can enable/disable using the EnableWindow method, but how do I
In scala.util.matching.Regex trait MatchData I see that there support for groupnames , I thought
From time to time I see projects that has a boot.scala or Boot.scala file
I currently have Scala 2.9.0.1 installed and see that Scala 2.9.1 was released fairly
I am wondering why scala can't infer the type of method parameters.I can see
I see that traits in Scala are similar to interfaces in Java (but interfaces
I see that this is the same question as Making cmake print commands before
I see that we cannot use if not exists in the create virtual table

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.