Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8561159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T16:26:24+00:00 2026-06-11T16:26:24+00:00

I see that the algorithm for measuring luminance in LUX for a pixel is

  • 0

I see that the algorithm for measuring luminance in LUX for a pixel is (obtained from here)

double luminance = r*0.299 + g*0.587 + b*0.114;

I’m interested in knowing the intensity of a given picture’s light in the “blue” spectrum, rather than pure luminance. How can this be done? Would simply taking the weighted “blue” value of each pixel in a camera image and somehow averaging/adding them do the trick?

Thank you for your input!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T16:26:25+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 4:26 pm

    Luminance is intensity per area.

    The formula you posted isn’t about converting red, green, and blue intensity to total luminance or vice-versa; it’s just about weighting red, green, and blue luminance to get total luminance. You’ve already got blue luminance, so the relevant formula for your purposes is:

    b
    

    Or, if you prefer:

    b*0.114
    

    For the other part, it depends on what you’re asking, but it’s probably somewhere along this path:

    The intensity for each pixel is the luminance for that pixel times the area of the pixel.

    The intensity for the whole array is the sum of all of those separate intensities.

    The luminance for the whole array is the intensity for the whole array divided by the total area of the array, and it should be obvious that’s also trivial.

    The luminance for the whole room is… well, presumably the whole point here is that you’re making the assumption that it’s roughly the same as the luminance for the camera array, so by assumption it’s just the same as the last value.

    The intensity for any plane within the whole room is then the luminance times the area of that plane, and the intensity for the room as a whole is then the sum across all those planes, but those probably aren’t very useful to you.

    The intensity for a picture is just the intensity across the camera array at the time you took the picture. That’s probably more useful than the intensity of the room.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am reading about Hill Cipher encryption algorithm, from the wikipedia. I see that
In connected components labeling, if I see that the pixel to the left and
I know that Floyd–Steinberg dithering algorithm can't be implemented with pixel shader, because that
I am reading Huffman Coding Algorithm to encode a string. I can see that
I see that this is the same question as Making cmake print commands before
I see that most of big websites are returning javascript objects instead of pure
I see that many people get this error, but their situations all appear a
I see that we cannot use if not exists in the create virtual table
I see that Spring has a @Required annotation to mark member variables in beans
I see that QButtonGroup s let you throw in an integer when you do

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.