Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6668619
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:03:39+00:00 2026-05-26T03:03:39+00:00

I see there is an importance in having a row inserted and a row

  • 0

I see there is an importance in having a row inserted and a row last updated fields in a fact table. But I could not find any standard data warehouse or a reference which says that this is a good thing to do. I am uncertain whether this is because it is a bad practice; if so why should it be so? If it is because of the data size, I see it is only 8bytes for a full date field.

Any help is greatly appreciated!!!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:03:39+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:03 am

    There’s nothing talking about whether it’s a good or bad practice because we include creation time and updated time only if we need them or ever will need them.

    It’s a “good thing to do” if you need to access those columns and a “bad thing to do” if your table will never require those columns.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I see there is a API call for Frienships/Show, but I am not sure
I see there is a question here but there is no definite answer. Has
I see there is version 1.5 and 3.0 beta , but I can't seem
I see there are BN_CLICKED and BN_DBLCLK notification messages for a button control. but
I see there is full ajax mode but I wanted to see if there
I'm having doubts about my table structure, and I wonder if there is a
I see there are a few . Which ones are maintained and easy to
I see there are two main options for managing transactions with llblgen. Method 1:
I see there are lot's of examples in Ext JS where instead of actually
I can see there are a lot of questions for getting the number of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.