Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8138211
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T11:25:13+00:00 2026-06-06T11:25:13+00:00

I seem to be running into a problem with temp table garbage collection: CREATE

  • 0

I seem to be running into a problem with temp table garbage collection:

CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.SetTestTempTable(@value bit)
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TestTempTable') IS NOT NULL 
    DROP TABLE #TestTempTable
SELECT @value AS Value INTO #TestTempTable

GO

EXEC dbo.SetTestTempTable 1
SELECT * FROM #TestTempTable

The above code produces the error

Msg 208, Level 16, State 0, Line 3
Invalid object name '#TestTempTable'.

I think because #TestTempTable is getting garbage collected when the proc exits.

Is there a way of preventing this? I don’t want to have every caller need to explicitly create the temp table before calling the procedure.

UPDATE:
Why am I doing this?

I have the need to store some contextual information (basically a session variable). I was using CONTEXT_INFO for this. SQL Azure doesn’t support CONTEXT_INFO, so I’m refactoring accordingly. Essentially, I have a function:

GetMySessionVariableName()

and a procedure

SetMySessionVariableName(value)

Previously, this function and procedure used CONTEXT_INFO internally, and that worked fine. Now, with temp tables, it doesn’t…I’m open to suggestions on alternative approaches.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T11:25:15+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 11:25 am

    The #temp table is dropped (well, deferred dropped) when the stored procedure goes out of scope. So it is not available to you outside of the scope of the stored procedure. In order to see the contents of #temp after the procedure finishes, you need to create it before you execute the stored procedure, and populate it inside… or perform the select inside the stored procedure.

    For the updated requirement, why not just use a permanent table with a key on UserID, and update your stored procedures to take UserID as a parameter? If you already have a Users table you could surely store updated session information in a column or two there. No CONTEXT_INFO or #temp table nonsense required.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am running into a problem that just doesn't seem right. I've got a
I'm running into a problem that I can't seem to get past. Whenever I
I'm running into an odd problem where window.addEventListener (or window.attachEvent) doesn't seem to be
Here's a problem that I seem to be running into working with an accounting
I seem to be running into a problem with Rails 3 and I can't
I seem to be running into an odd problem. When using my GWT application
So I'm running into a problem where the try: except: mechanism doesn't seem to
I'm running into a conceptual problem that I cannot seem to conquer in my
I seem to be running into a problem. Considering the follow XML structure: <data>
I'm running into a problem that I can't seem to solve. The code works

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.