Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1068085
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:14:30+00:00 2026-05-16T20:14:30+00:00

I seem to remember that ANSI C didn’t specify what value should be returned

  • 0

I seem to remember that ANSI C didn’t specify what value should be returned when either operand of a modulo operator is negative (just that it should be consistent). Did it get specified later, or was it always specified and I am remembering incorrectly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:14:30+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:14 pm

    C89, not totally (§3.3.5/6). It can be either -5 or 5, because -5 / 10 can return 0 or -1 (% is defined in terms of a linear equation involving /, * and +):

    When integers are divided and the division is inexact, if both operands are positive the result of the / operator is the largest integer less than the algebraic quotient and the result of the % operator is positive. If either operand is negative, whether the result of the / operator is the largest integer less than the algebraic quotient or the smallest integer greater than the algebraic quotient is implementation-defined, as is the sign of the result of the % operator. If the quotient a/b is representable, the expression (a/b)*b + a%b shall equal a.

    C99, yes (§6.5.5/6), the result must be -5:

    When integers are divided, the result of the / operator is the algebraic quotient with any fractional part discarded.88) If the quotient a/b is representable, the expression (a/b)*b + a%b shall equal a.

    88) This is often called "truncation toward zero".


    Similarly, in C++98 the result is implementation defined (§5.6/4), following C89’s definition, but mentions that the round-towards-zero rule is preferred,

    … If both operands are nonnegative then the remainder is nonnegative; if not, the sign of the remainder is implementation-defined74).

    74) According to work underway toward the revision of ISO C, the preferred algorithm for integer division follows the rules defined in the ISO Fortran standard, ISO/IEC 1539:1991, in which the quotient is always rounded toward zero.

    and indeed it becomes the standard rule in C++0x (§5.6/4):

    … For integral operands the / operator yields the algebraic quotient with any fractional part discarded;82 …

    82) This is often called truncation towards zero.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I seem to remember reading something about how it is bad for structs to
I seem to remember being able to print out (or locate) the specific switches
I don't remember whether I was dreaming or not but I seem to recall
Seem to be having an issue with std::auto_ptr and assignment, such that the object
I seem to be missing something about LINQ. To me, it looks like it's
There seem to be many ways to define singletons in Python. Is there a
I seem right now to be embroiled in a debate with another programmer on
I seem to make this mistake every time I set up a new development
I seem to always have problems with converting data to and from XML in
There seem to many ways to skin this particular cat - but which is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.