Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 307397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T07:33:17+00:00 2026-05-12T07:33:17+00:00

I set out to solve a problem we have, where under certain circumstances; we

  • 0

I set out to solve a problem we have, where under certain circumstances; we may need to make an attribute or relationship immutable, that is once the attribute is written it is written forever. attr_readonly wasn’t appropriate, as that didn’t work for relationships, so I tried to prove the concept here:

http://pastie.org/562329

This shows my tests, an example implementation (that ideally I would move to a module) — I’m not sure if this is an acceptable way to overload a relationship setter, I have expanded the test to now read http://pastie.org/562417 which may be overkill, but helped me understand how customer_id relates to customer as an attribute as against a relationship, but I’d be more than happy to be corrected!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T07:33:18+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:33 am

    I haven’t tried it, but I think update_attribute(:customer_id => 1) will break in some cases. Also, I really don’t like the idea of overriding attribute setters.

    A better (IMHO) approach would be to override ‘before_update’ and take a not of it if anything was changed. You can do that using the Dirty module. Check out this:

    I haven’t tested this, but it would go something of the lines of:

    class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
      IMMUTABLE = %w{customer_id notes}
    
      before_save do |record|
        return false if IMMUTABLE.any? { |attr| record.changed.has_key?(attr) }
      end
    end
    

    Of course, you’ll have a better idea on how to handle IMMUTABLE. If you put this in a Module, the before_save has to be in the Module#included hook

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 291k
  • Answers 291k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can't assign to arrays in C. C allows initializing… May 13, 2026 at 6:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A List has constant time access just like an array.… May 13, 2026 at 6:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I now think this was actually a tomcat bug getParameter()… May 13, 2026 at 6:05 pm

Related Questions

I have a bit of a problem with the algorithm proposed as homework by
I'm in the process of trying to move our company from SalesForce to SugarCRM,
I've been working on this for a few days now, and I've found several
As part of upgrading JRun, we are moving from a 1.4 JVM to a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.