Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6734893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T10:56:36+00:00 2026-05-26T10:56:36+00:00

I stubled upon a weird problem. The following code results in making the image

  • 0

I stubled upon a weird problem. The following code results in making the image fade away because it’s overdrawn by a semi-opaque rect over and over again.

But at least at the 10th iteration of draw(); the image should be completely overdrawn, because the rect should be fully opaque by then, right? But it actually never disappears completely.

This effect is worse on Chrome than it is on Firefox. But beware: bad screens may hide this faulty behaviour =)

I also made a demo on jsFiddle.

$(function () {
var canvas = $("#mycanvas"),
    ctx = canvas[0].getContext("2d"),
    imgUrl = "http://it-runde.de/dateien/2009/august/14/25.png";


var image = new Image();  
image.src = imgUrl ;  
$(image).load(function() {
    ctx.drawImage(image, 0, 0, canvas.width(), canvas.height());
    draw();
});

function draw() {        
    ctx.fillStyle = "rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1)";
    ctx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width(), canvas.height());
    setTimeout(draw, 100);
    
}    
});

The effect one may want to achieve is that, say an object is moving all over the canvas, and the already drawn positions get overdrawn only slightly so after-glow of after-fade effect. But this result is just fugly.

So is there any solution to this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T10:56:36+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:56 am

    Since the rectangle is only 10% opaque, the result of drawing it over the image is a composite of 90% of the image and 10% white. Each time you draw it you lose 10% of the previous iteration of the image; the rectangle itself does not become more opaque. (To get that effect, you would need to position another object over the image and animate its opacity.) So after 10 iterations you still have (0.9^10) or about 35% of the original image. Note that rounding errors will probably set in after about 30 iterations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've stumbled upon the following two weird looking properties: Process.GetCurrentProcess().MainModule; Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location; These properties are
I stumbled upon some code the other day that was making use of query
i recently stumbled upon a seemingly weird behavior that Google completely failed to explain.
I'm using callables quite often , and I've stubled upon a question that irritates
I stumbled upon this code and I am curious as to what use may
I stumbled upon a problem of how to make work together acts_as_taggable (on steroids)
I have stumbled upon the following F77 yacc grammar: http://yaxx.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/yaxx/yaxx/fortran/fortran.y?revision=1.3&view=markup . How can I
I have recently stumbled upon a problem with selecting relationship details from a 1
I stumbled upon the following construction in C++: bool result = false; for(int i
I stumbled upon a rather exotic c++ namespace problem: condensed example: extern C {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.