Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8556847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T15:26:45+00:00 2026-06-11T15:26:45+00:00

I stuck with choosing synchronization primitive. This is the case: I have pool of

  • 0

I stuck with choosing synchronization primitive.

This is the case:
I have pool of threads, that are in infinitive loop, and waits for some event. And another thread that should invoke this event. When event fires all wating thread should make one iteration and fall back for waiting event again.

Should I use manualResetEvent for this? I can’t understand, is there any garanty, that if i wrote in control thread something like this

event.Set();
event.Reset();

All waiting threads make iteration, and all waiting threads makes only one, not two ore three, iterations.

Or should I use another primitive for my case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T15:26:46+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 3:26 pm

    Use Monitor.Wait(someObject) in the looping threads, and Monitor.PulseAll(someObject) in the event raising thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Been stuck on this for ages. Currently learning Django and done some bits on
I have an app that uses a service in the background to do some
Kinda stuck here... I have an application with lets say 5000 rows of data
Im stuck with this little project in C# but basically my problem is this:
I'm stuck on a the type of trigger needed to for this constraint. I
I have a Windows Forms application (.NET 4) that runs fine on my development
I'm aware that questions about the stack vs. the heap have been asked several
I am currently creating an order form. However, I have been stuck at the
I am currently creating an order form. However, I have been stuck at the
So, I've noticed that I definitely have a tendency to pattern my Spring/Hibernate stack

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.