Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6920303
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T10:07:49+00:00 2026-05-27T10:07:49+00:00

I stumbled across a code based on unions in C. Here is the code:

  • 0

I stumbled across a code based on unions in C. Here is the code:

    union    {  
        struct  {  
            char ax[2];  
            char ab[2];  
        } s;  
        struct  {  
            int a;  
            int b;  
        } st;  
    } u ={12, 1}; 

    printf("%d %d", u.st.a, u.st.b);  

I just couldn’t understand how come the output was 268 0. How were the values initialized?
How is the union functioning here? Shouldn’t the output be 12 1. It would be great if anyone could explain what exactly is happening here in detail.

I am using a 32 bit processor and on Windows 7.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T10:07:50+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:07 am

    The code doesn’t do what you think. Brace-initializes initialize the first union member, i.e. u.s. However, now the initializer is incomplete and missing braces, since u.s contains two arrays. It should be somethink like: u = { { {'a', 'b'}, { 'c', 'd' } } };

    You should always compile with all warnings, a decent compiler should have told you that something was amiss. For instance, GCC says, missing braces around initialiser (near initialisation for ‘u.s’) and missing initialiser (near initialisation for ‘u.s.ab’). Very helpful.

    In C99 you can take advantage of named member initialization to initialize the second union member: u = { .st = {12, 1} }; (This is not possible in C++, by the way.) The corresponding syntax for the first case is `u = { .s = { {'a', 'b'}, { 'c', 'd' } } };, which is arguably more explicit and readable!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just stumbled across this bug in some legacy code: class MyAPIHandler { private:
I'm familiar with $get() and $find() . But, I've just stumbled across some code
I'm working on porting some classic VB6 code to C# and just stumbled across
I stumbled across this code and am too proud to go and ask the
Googling is only coming up with the keyword, but I stumbled across some code
I stumbled across this C code today. Can anyone tell me what the 'where'
I was calculating the Fibonacci sequence, and stumbled across this code, which I saw
I recently stumbled across DBslayer ( http://code.nytimes.com/projects/dbslayer/wiki/WhyUseIt ) and wondered what is the actual
I was browsing my teacher's code when I stumbled across this: Order* order1 =
I was looking at some existing code and stumbled across a variable declaration I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.