Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 369065
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T13:53:02+00:00 2026-05-12T13:53:02+00:00

I suspect the answer to this is No, based purely on the concept of

  • 0

I suspect the answer to this is “No”, based purely on the concept of type safety in general, but I shall ask anyway.

If I define a stored function in MySQL, normally part of the CREATE syntax defines the return type of function.

Is it possible to define one where the return type is one of two possible types, depending on the result, but which is unknown to the caller? Specifically, I’m interested in specifying DECIMAL types with two different precisions based on the value returned, so that I don’t have to CAST these values explicitly everywhere they are used.

I know that I can explicitly use, for example, CASE and CAST to change the precision in a stored procedure or regular statement, but I’d like to abstract that code away into a stored function.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T13:53:02+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:53 pm

    My answer is “WHY?”, not “No!”. 🙂

    If it’s not possible, create two stored procedures! One which will give the result with the highest precision and a second one that accepts parameters with lower precision which calls the high-precision function and it will cast the result back to the lower precision.

    Two different functions with two different footprints, but basically they just do the same.

    Abstraction is only useful when you’re using an object-oriented approach. But stored procedures in databases aren’t OO, just plain methods.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm surprisingly frustrated by this, and I suspect the answer is simple. I have
Just as in title. Is suspect it is, but I couldn't find it anywhere
I've notice an issue - it feels like a bug but I suspect a
I'm trying to get this piece of code working a little better. I suspect
I've got no experience with this, so i suspect my logic is overly complicated,
I appreciate there is no 'set' answer to this question. I am trying to
I suspect that one of my applications eats more CPU cycles than I want
I'm having a lot of issues with NSDate objects being prematurely deallocated. I suspect
I'm trying to build a very, very simple micro-webapp which I suspect will be
I have a table like this: Item { int ItemID int ParentID string Name

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.