Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6628123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T22:05:39+00:00 2026-05-25T22:05:39+00:00

I suspect this is a basic question(but I tried to google and search SO

  • 0

I suspect this is a basic question(but I tried to google and search SO with no luck).

I have a list: [1, 2,3,4]

and I want to know where in the list the value of 3 is..but without using a for loop to go through the entire list. Is that possible? I’m already going through a very large list and want to minimize the number of loops through the entire list.

Is this possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T22:05:39+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:05 pm
    [1, 2, 3, 4].index(3) # --> 2
    

    .index() will raise an IndexError if it cannot find the value you are looking for.

    Keep in mind if you are doing lots of .index() look-ups on large lists, that it can be very slow — Python has to brute-force loop through the lists just like you were doing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a website (the basic gist of which is described in this question
I have the feeling this should be quite basic, but I've failed to find
I'm sorry if this question is basic(I'm new to nosql). Basically I have a
First off, please accept my apologies if this question is basic, I mainly have
I suspect this applies to general ASP.Net too but I am not sure. If
One day I suspect I'll have to learn hadoop and transfer all this data
This is a total newbie question, but I wonder if someone could assist with
This is a basic question about what options are available for defining the scope
Sorry if this is a basic question - I'm having some trouble making the
I'm sure this is a basic OOP question -- I'm designing a message-passing system

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.