Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8730013
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T08:56:17+00:00 2026-06-13T08:56:17+00:00

I tend to create a synchronized method by using [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.Synchronized)] However, I realize MethodImplOptions.Synchronized

  • 0

I tend to create a synchronized method by using

[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.Synchronized)]

However, I realize MethodImplOptions.Synchronized is not found in Metro.

Hence, what is the equivalent replacement?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T08:56:17+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:56 am

    Hence, what is the equivalent replacement?

    MethodImplOptions.Synchronized is just an equivalent for these constructs:

    lock(this)
    {
        InstanceFoo(); // instance method
    }
    
    lock(typeof(MyType))
    {
        StaticFoo(); // static method
    }
    

    you can use regular lock, but I strongly recommend to not lock on this and typeof().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Whenever I create a PHP library (not a framework) I tend to reinvent everything
Inside the Rails code, people tend to use the Enumerable#inject method to create hashes,
Usually I tend to install things via the package manager, for unixy stuff. However,
I usually tend to define the model layer of my apps using POJO's, such
On every new professional project I tend to (re)-create the same helpers and utils
when i create a new netbeans project netbeans tend to manage it with subversion
I tend to use enums to create mini data tables all over my code.
Out of habit I tend to put classes/structs/enumerations in separate files when not nested.
I have a project that needs to create and use COM objects. I found
Whenever I create an abstract class I tend to create an interface to go

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.