Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4027004
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T11:02:34+00:00 2026-05-20T11:02:34+00:00

I there I have this scenario: a) Notebook :Windows Server 2008 R1, Visual basic

  • 0

I there

I have this scenario:

a) Notebook :Windows Server 2008 R1, Visual basic 6 with all service pack.

b) Desktop : Windows Server 2008 R1 (recently update to sp1, i dunno if it is the guilty), Visual basic 6 with all service pack.

c) Client machine (Windows XP)

I created an executable in a) and installed it in c). It uses ADO (msado15.dll) and it works fine in a) and in C)

Then, using the same code, i tried to do the same in b) (compiling in b) ) and it work in b) but it fail in c). I verified that it is the same code in a) and in b)

In resume:

A machine

  • executable_compiled_in_a.exe WORKS
  • executable_compiled_in_b.exe WORKS

B machine

  • executable_compiled_in_a.exe WORKS
  • executable_compiled_in_b.exe WORKS

C machine (customer machine)

  • executable_compiled_in_a.exe WORKS
  • executable_compiled_in_b.exe FAIL!

The error message is

Class does not support Automation or does not support expected interface

and is trigged by the line

Set Data = New ADODB.Connection

So, i don’t get it what is the trouble, both uses the same reference but b) generated a different executable.

ps: MSDAC_TYP DOES NOT WORK IN XP and it is not a problem of MSDAC because the executable generated in a) works in c).

ps2: i also tried using msado27.tlb and msado28.tlb with the same results.

ps3: my developers machines (a) and b) ) are 64bits, while the customer machine is 32bits.

Thanks.

Update

The latest service of Windows Server 2008 R1 (and i think the same for Windows 7) update the version of ADO and the executables. Short story, the latest SP1 is evil and will bring a lot of trouble, at least for ADO and development machines.

msado15.dll without service pack 6.1.7600

msado15.dll with service pack 6.1.7601

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T11:02:34+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:02 am

    Install kb983246 on your client’s machines. Another workaround is to use the ADO old type library but it have the issue described in kb983246 on 64bit machines.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There have been a couple of questions that sort of dealt with this but
I have this legacy code that I am working with and there is code
i have this block of xslt if-else case and was wondering if there's a
I know there have been a few threads on this before, but I have
I have this unordered list <ul> <li>two</li> <li>three</li> </ul> Is there a way I
I have seen this question: Are there any decent UI components for touch screen
This is a little out there but I have a customer object coming back
Is there anyway to have the var be of a nullable type? This implicitly
I was just wondering whether there is some way to do this: I have
There is probably is simple fix for this but I currently have code similar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.