Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7663569
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T14:05:11+00:00 2026-05-31T14:05:11+00:00

I think I already know the answer to this, but I’m currently working on

  • 0

I think I already know the answer to this, but I’m currently working on re-vamping some legacy Visual C++ 6.0 code, and I was working on putting in some CCriticalSections, But then I got thinking about it, if all my function does is return a pointer to some data, I think the critical sections is probably useless, because I don’t think im really protecting the data its pointing too, I don’t think it really stops anyone from writing to it. (assuming i have the same locks around the setter).

What do you think?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T14:05:12+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 2:05 pm

    Yes if you are returning pointers to a data then deferencing the pointers outside the critical section would be a problem. Access to the critical shared data must be within the locks.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think I already know the answer to this but thought I would ask
I think i already know the answer to this, but i cannot find anything
I've been doing some research and I think I know the answer already, but
I think I might already know the answer to this one but I need
I think I may already know the answer to this, but here goes. I
I think I already know the answer to this question is No, but I
I think I already know the answer but... Given this statement: Insert Into Allergy
I think I already know the answer to this question because it seems, uh,
I think I already know the answer, but just to make sure. I am
I'm pretty sure I already know the answer, but would like some confirmation... We

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.