Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 155563
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T10:10:40+00:00 2026-05-11T10:10:40+00:00

I think I have the same problem as kcrumley describes in the question Problem

  • 0

I think I have the same problem as kcrumley describes in the question ‘Problem calling stored procedure from another stored procedure via classic ASP‘. However his question does not really include an solution, so I’ll give it another shot, adding my own observations:

I have two stored procedures:

CREATE PROCEDURE return_1 AS BEGIN     SET NOCOUNT ON;     SELECT 1 END  CREATE PROCEDURE call_return_1_and_return_2 AS BEGIN     SET NOCOUNT ON;     EXEC return_1     SELECT 2 END 

Note that both procedures contain ‘SET NOCOUNT ON’. When I execute ‘call_return_1_and_return_2’ I still get two record sets. First the value 1, then the value 2.

That throws ASP (classic VBScript ASP) off the tracks.

Any hints on how I can suppress the first result set? Why is it there even with NOCOUNT?

Skipping the first record set in ASP is not an option. I need a ‘database only’ solution.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T10:10:40+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:10 am

    Its not the NOCOUNT thats causing this, your stored procedures have a select each so each one is coming in its own result set. This could be avoided by changing your first stored procedure to use output parameters to pass the number 1 back rather than doing a select. The second stored procedure could then examine the output parameter to get the data it needs to run.

    Try something like this

    CREATE PROCEDURE Proc1 (     @RetVal INT OUTPUT ) AS SET NOCOUNT ON SET @RetVal = 1 

    CREATE PROCEDURE Proc2 AS SET NOCOUNT ON DECLARE @RetVal int EXEC    [dbo].[Proc1]         @RetVal = @RetVal OUTPUT SELECT  @RetVal as N'@RetVal' 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 130k
  • Answers 130k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think the biggest problem is that you're using GDI… May 12, 2026 at 6:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer use strict; use warnings; my $infile = $ARGV[0] or die… May 12, 2026 at 6:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm using both regularly now. Visual studio is easier and… May 12, 2026 at 6:06 am

Related Questions

(I believe this is the same problem as this one , but there's no
I have a client/server application that depends on MS SQL database for backend storage,
I've had the same problem with sql for a while and as I sit
Sometimes I need to insert into the table some null values, or update them

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.