Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6139679
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T18:01:18+00:00 2026-05-23T18:01:18+00:00

I think I know the answer to this but I have the need to

  • 0

I think I know the answer to this but I have the need to specify that a generic method can take a type based on two optional constraints. That being that T can be either one type or another.

public WebPage Click<T>(Func<WebPage> predicate) where T : LinkBase || FieldBase, new()
{
    WebDriver.FindElement(new T().LinkPath).Click();
    WebDriver.Wait();
    return predicate.Invoke();
}

I know that there is no such syntax currently, but is there a way to solve this without duplicating the method to constrain on both types? If not, is this in the realms of possibility for a future version of the language?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T18:01:19+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 6:01 pm

    You’re right, there’s no way to pass in multiple types into a generic method.

    Do you have control over both types? Can you make them each implement the same interface or abstract class?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think I might already know the answer to this one but I need
I think I already know the answer to this but thought I would ask
Well I think I know the answer to this, but I would appreciate anybody
I think I already know the answer to this one, but i hope maybe
I think i already know the answer to this, but i cannot find anything
i think i sort of know the answer to this, but there are always
I've been doing some research and I think I know the answer already, but
I think know how to do this in C# but I'm having syntax trouble
I have search all over the web but could not find answer to this
Answer: I know this is not the kind of thing that goes well as

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.