Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8580829
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T20:54:35+00:00 2026-06-11T20:54:35+00:00

I think I may have implemented this incorrectly because the results do not make

  • 0

I think I may have implemented this incorrectly because the results do not make sense. I have a Go program that counts to 1000000000:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
)

func main() {
    for i := 0; i < 1000000000; i++ {}
    fmt.Println("Done") 
}

It finishes in less than a second. On the other hand I have a Python script:

x = 0
while x < 1000000000:
    x+=1
print 'Done'

It finishes in a few minutes.

Why is the Go version so much faster? Are they both counting up to 1000000000 or am I missing something?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T20:54:37+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 8:54 pm

    One billion is not a very big number. Any reasonably modern machine should be able to do this in a few seconds at most, if it’s able to do the work with native types. I verified this by writing an equivalent C program, reading the assembly to make sure that it actually was doing addition, and timing it (it completes in about 1.8 seconds on my machine).

    Python, however, doesn’t have a concept of natively typed variables (or meaningful type annotations at all), so it has to do hundreds of times as much work in this case. In short, the answer to your headline question is “yes”. Go really can be that much faster than Python, even without any kind of compiler trickery like optimizing away a side-effect-free loop.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think this may be relatively straight forward. I have a rewrite rule that
Hopefully this question isn't as subjective as I think it may be. I have
I think I may be using the DependencyObject incorrectly. I have a generic class
I don't think this is a simple LIMIT query. I have organisers that have
I think I may have encountered a bug in mysql, or is it just
I think I may have a misunderstanding of <xsl:variable\> and <xsl:value-of\> so perhaps someone
I think I may have accidently disabled stylecop in my Visual Studio 2008 enviroment.
I think we may have trouble with our existing project. For some reasons we
I think I may have used a repeater when I should have used something
http://pastebin.com/mYk8M038 here is what I have so far... I think it may be something

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.