Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7744393
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T09:45:23+00:00 2026-06-01T09:45:23+00:00

I think I understand OSPF – it is Link-State routing, with a domain split

  • 0

I think I understand OSPF – it is Link-State routing, with a domain split into different areas.

Having one area as the backbone obviously creates a hierarchy, but I thought that the point of hierarchies was to decrease the amount of information that each individual node stored, and I don’t understand how OSPF does that.

From what I understand (from Computer Networks, A Systems Approach), is that routers on the border to the backbone area (ABRs) collect routing information about their outer area, then advertise this to the routers in the backbone (with the simplified costs), and then this is forwarded out to all of the other areas.

So from that, we still have the same amount of information in every router (the next hop to get to every other router), its just that we’ve changed the costs, and forced all outer area communication to go through the backbone.

Is this true? If so, what is the point of splitting it up into domains. If not, could you please point out where I’ve gone wrong.

Thanks alot.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T09:45:25+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 9:45 am

    Every router in an OSPF area knows the entire topology for its area and runs the SPF algorithm to find the shortest paths. Inter-area routes appear to your routers as all originating from the ABR, so that the adjacent area’s topology does not have to be added to the OSPF database and be included in the SPF algorithm. The point isn’t to make the routing table smaller, it’s to make the OSPF database in each area simpler and therefore the SPF algorithm less CPU intensive to run.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think I understand the basic principals of T4 but I'm having a hard
I think understand the definition of State / Interaction based testing (read the Fowler
I'm having some issues trying to setup my Routing in MVC. I think I
I think I understand how class-loading hierarchies work. (the JVM looks into the parent
I think I understand how ASP.NET routing works, and in general how the IIS
I think understand the idea of duck typing, and would like to use it
I think I understand unit testing. But I was wondering: is there a way
I think I understand strong typing , but every time I look for examples
I think I understand the happened-before relationship for single variables. If I write a
I understand how JS is run and I think I understand most of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.