Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7667901
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T15:13:18+00:00 2026-05-31T15:13:18+00:00

I think the answer is no but I’m looking to give someone access to

  • 0

I think the answer is no but I’m looking to give someone access to a SQL Server database but I only really want them to have access to one table.

It’s easy enough to limit someone to only access one database but have no idea if I can limit to a single table.

My thoughts were to create another database with a synonym to the other table and then limit the access to that database but I wondered if someone could think of a better way.

I’m also not convinced that it will work as I think there will be a conflict of permissions.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T15:13:19+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 3:13 pm

    Yes.

    exec sp_msforeachtable "DENY SELECT ON ? TO [username];"
    GO
    
    GRANT SELECT ON [schemaName].[tableName] to [username]
    Go 
    

    While that works, you would probably be better off managing permissions using roles and AD groups.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think its a rather simple question but I couldn't really find an answer
I think the answer is yes but I just want to make sure. so
Simple question for which I think I have an answer but I am looking
I think answer on my question is NO. But still, I'm wondering is it
I think the answer to this is no going in, but I could use
I think I already know the answer to this but thought I would ask
I think I already know the answer to this one, but i hope maybe
I think there is a simple answer to this, but for some reason I
I think i already know the answer to this, but i cannot find anything
Well I think I know the answer to this, but I would appreciate anybody

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.