Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4607930
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T00:46:20+00:00 2026-05-22T00:46:20+00:00

I think the question is clear. PLinq doesn’t allow you to create more than

  • 0

I think the question is clear. PLinq doesn’t allow you to create more than 63 threads (WithDegreeOfParallelism doesn’t allow it, throws ArgumentOutOfRangeException). In rare situations, we need to acquire more than 63 thread from thread pool (such as I/O operations, where a task needs more time to complete than usual). As far as I know, the Parallel class also has the same limitation. Is there any workaround? what’s the reason for this limitation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T00:46:21+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:46 am

    Quoted from this link:

    With Parallel.For/ForEach, there’s no
    implicit limit, however the ThreadPool
    in .NET 4 (which Parallel.For/ForEach
    target by default) will only use up to
    64 logical processors. PLINQ in .NET
    4 does have hard-coded limit of 63
    partitions. As larger and larger
    machines become available, I expect
    you’ll see such limitations removed,
    just as how with the latest versions
    of Windows the OS supports up to 256
    logical processors.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think my question is clear enough, but I explain more. Simply, when we
This is actually a much more concise, much more clear question than the one
I think my question is already clear enough, but to make it even more
I think the question title is clear enough: is is possible to stable_sort() a
I think the question is clear enough but still - what's the difference between:
I think the question is clear enough. Some of the columns in my datawarehouse
I think my question is fairly clear, I would like to know if every
The question is quite clear I think. I'm trying to write a compiler detection
I think the following code will make the question clear. // My class var
I don't think that was the most clear question, but an example should make

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.