Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 956249
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:30:49+00:00 2026-05-16T00:30:49+00:00

I think we can all agree that Automatic Properties in C# 3.0 are great.

  • 0

I think we can all agree that Automatic Properties in C# 3.0 are great. Something like this:

private string name;
public string Name
{
    get { return name; }
    set { name = value; }
}

Gets reduced to this:

public string Name { get; set; }

Lovely!

But what am I supposed to do if I want to, say, convert the Name string using the ToUpperInvariant() method while “setting”. Do I need to revert back to the old C# 2.0 style of creating properties?

    private string name;
    public string Name
    {
        get { return name; }
        set { name = value.ToUpperInvariant(); }
    }

Or is there a more elegant way of accomplishing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:30:49+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:30 am

    Yes, you have to convert it back. An autoproperty can’t do this kind of checks.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Hi all I am having some problems that I think can be attributed to
All the ways I can think to do this seem very hackish. What is
Looking to do a security audit of all user permissions. I think I can
I've got a pretty minor problem that I think can be resolved by re-thinking
I can think of lots of ways to do this on my own, but
In Ruby I think you can call a method that hasn't been defined and
I will create an ASP.NET Web Application like this; Users can login their own
We all agree that duplication is evil and should be avoid (Don't Repeat Yourself
I'd like some ideas about how I should test some objects that can block,
I think most C++ programmers here would agree that polluting the global namespace is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.