Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 623027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:02:54+00:00 2026-05-13T19:02:54+00:00

I thought that constructors control initialization and operator= functions control assignment in C++. So

  • 0

I thought that constructors control initialization and operator= functions control assignment in C++. So why does this code work?

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;

class Deg {
    public:
        Deg() {}
        Deg(int a) : d(a) {}        
        void operator()(double a)
        {
            cout << pow(a,d) << endl;
        }

    private:
        int d;
};

int
main(int argc, char **argv) 
{
    Deg d = 2;
    d(5);
    d = 3; /* this shouldn't work, Deg doesn't have an operator= that takes an int */
    d(5);
    return 0;
}

On the third line of the main function, I am assigning an int to an object of class Deg. Since I don’t have an operator=(int) function, I thought that this would certainly fail…but instead it calls the Deg(int a) constructor. So do constructors control assignment as well?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:02:54+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:02 pm

    This is what’s called implicit type conversion. The compiler will look to see if there’s a constructor to directly change from the type you’re assigning to the type you’re trying to assign, and call it. You can stop it from happening by adding the explicit keyword in front of the constructor you wouldn’t like to be implicitly called, like this:

    explicit Deg(int a) : d(a) {}

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I thought that this was easier… I have a asp:hyperlink control, with target=_blank ,
I thought that I improve performance when I replace this code: def f(a, b):
I thought that in principle Haskell's type system would forbid calls to impure functions
I thought that by convention, only methods with an exclamation mark altered the object.
I thought that a 32-bit process could use at most 2GB RAM, since half
I thought that a delegate instance was interchangeable with a function instance. Take the
I thought that by default my Regex would exhibit the greedy behavior that I
I thought that calling BeginInvoke more than once on the same delegate instance would
I thought that layout is just a widget that keeps more widgets inside. But
I thought that the purpose of Ruby's BigDecimal class is that it is infinitely

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.